Martin Fehervary: 2022-23 Washington Capitals Season Review

In our latest review of the Washington Capitals‘ 2022-23 season performance for defensemen, we’ll be taking a look at Martin Fehervary’s contributions on the ice.

Fehervary was drafted in the second round (46th overall) in the 2018 NHL Entry Draft. Fehervary spent the 2018-19 season in the SHL with HV71 Jonkoping, then made his way to North America for the 2019-20 season. Fehervary spent most of that season with the Hershey Bears, but got his first taste of NHL action, appearing in six games with the Capitals. Fehervary then spent the entire 2020-21 season in Hershey.

Fehervary became an NHL regular on the Caps blueline in the 2021-22 season, appearing in 79 games. He had a bit more of an injury-marred 2022-23 campaign, appearing in 67 games this past season.

Now, Fehervary is a restricted free agent after his entry-level contract with the Capitals expired at the end of this past season.

The statistics used in this post are courtesy of Natural Stat Trick, Evolving Hockey, Hockey Reference, HockeyDB, and HockeyViz. Contract and transaction information are courtesy of CapFriendly. If you’d like to learn more about the statistical terms used in this post, please check out our NHL Analytics Glossary.


We’ll start our evaluation of Fehervary’s play in the most important game situation: five-on-five play. Here’s a breakdown of his performance in key metrics this season:

There’s certainly not a lot to celebrate here. Fehervary definitely had his struggles this season, but so did the entire Caps roster. Obviously, team quality has a large impact on underlying metrics, so Fehervary didn’t really post exemplary numbers with the talent around him. On top of that, he received some tough deployment duties, only getting offensive zone starts 35.4% of the time.

In terms of offensive output, Fehervary contributed six goals and 10 assists for 16 points in 67 games played this season. He posted just one fewer point than the 2021-22 season in 12 fewer games played.

To add a bit of context behind his season-long performance, let’s take a look at Fehervary’s performance in possession and shot generation/suppression metrics by month this season:

Overall, there’s two real high points for Fehervary this season: November and February. Also, December looks worse than it probably would have looked if he had appeared in more than three games that month.

Outside of the slow start in October, the small sample size in December, and the meaningless games played in April, Fehervary’s possession and shot generation/suppression metrics are relatively consistent. I’m not putting a ton of stock into anyone’s performance in April since the Caps were out of the playoff race with not much to play for.

Now, let’s look at Fehervary’s goals for percentage (GF%) and expected goals for percentage (xGF%) by month:

I mentioned previously that December was a really small sample size, and you can tell by the fact that Fehervary carried a 100 GF% in those three games that month. The issue here is that outside of October, the small sample size in December, and in April, Fehervary consistently had his GF% trail behind his xGF%. I’ve mentioned several times in the past that this is an issue that the Capitals suffered through at the team level this season, but this is a key issue that the Capitals need to solve for this off-season through the restructuring of the roster.

Let’s further examine the differentials here by using goals for per sixty (GF/60) and expected goals for per sixty (xGF/60) by month:

Outside of severely outpacing his xGF/60 rate in October and December, Fehervary’s actual output versus expected were relatively close together (except for February). Obviously, February was really the turning point in the direction of the team this season, so that’s not necessarily surprising.

Here’s the opposite side of the coin, where we’ll compare Fehervary’s goals against per sixty (GA/60) versus expected goals against per sixty (xGA/60):

The first two months of the season were positive, with GA/60 falling below xGA/60. These metrics are definitely affected by goaltending performance, so that’s a possible variable here. In October, Fehervary’s five-on-five on ice save percentage was .923%, and in November, his on ice save percentage was .926%.

When we get into January, his on-ice save percentage was .889. February was .855. This points to a bit more of a streak of bad luck, due to the Caps owning 51.27% of high-danger chances (HDCF%) and 50% of high-danger goals for (HDGF%) through January and February combined. A large part of that was a bit of a downturn in performance by goaltenders that month. Charlie Lindgren posted a .864 save percentage and Darcy Kuemper posted a .900 save percentage. Obviously, it’s not all on the goaltenders there.


Here’s a look at the top four-most utilized pairings for Fehervary this past season:

The majority of Fehervary’s deployments this season were on a pairing with Nick Jensen during five-on-five play. While the metrics above are nothing to scream in happiness about, the fact that those two were able to post a 49.03 xGF% while only getting 32.18% of offensive zone starts is impressive.

What’s interesting to me is that there’s such a drop in performance on a pairing with John Carlson. In the past, Fehervary has mostly been utilized in a pairing with Carlson, so you’d figure there would be a bit more chemistry there. With their expected goals differential (the xG Diff in the chart), this means that they’re a bit better offensively than they are defensively. There’s really no world where a pairing with John Carlson on it should be getting only 39.68% of their zone starts in the offensive zone. That’s just not utilizing a Carlson pairing very well.

Interestingly enough, Fehervary posted his best xG Diff on a pairing with Matt Irwin, who had his struggles all season. I think we’re seeing where Fehervary can shine with a bit more of a defensively focused defenseman on his pairing. Fehervary’s offensive skills have grown over the past two seasons, and he’s definitely more of a offensively leaning two-way defenseman at this point in time.


First, let’s take a look at how Fehervary has fared in Goals Above Replacement (GAR) and expected Goals Above Replacement (xGAR) this season compared to the rest of his career:

We can likely just disregard his 2019-20 performance, since it was only six games of action at the NHL level. That sample size is so small that it’s really difficult to glean his actual level of performance that year.

After a sub-replacement level performance last season in both GAR and xGAR, Fehervary improved in both metrics this past season. That’s a sign of improvement for sure, mainly driven by his vast improvement in defensive GAR. In 2021-22, his defensive GAR was -4.7. This season, it’s 3.6.

Overall, from the underlying metrics standpoint, we could probably say that Fehervary went through a bit of a sophomore slump, but his player value metrics indicate otherwise. It’s starting to appear more like Fehervary’s struggles were more a result of the struggling team around him more than a degradation in quality of play on Fehervary’s part.

Here’s Fehervary’s Rate-Adjusted Plus Minus, which is used to compare a player’s performance in key metrics at a rate of sixty minutes of play to the league average:

Obviously, we weren’t going to see great results here since they’re based off of the underlying statistics we covered earlier in the post. The bright side is his xGA/60 tracking above league average, meaning that he’s playing well defensively and not giving up a bevy of high quality scoring chances against.


Here’s Fehervary’s individual isolated impact when he’s on the ice via HockeyViz:

The -9% impact on even-strength offense is actually not very surprising here. The Capitals were actually relatively effective in generating xGF this season (15th in the NHL in xGF), but struggled in actually converting those chances (17th in the NHL in GF). On top of that, with getting a higher share of non-offensive zone starts, it’s likely that Fehervary was not on the ice with the players who were more effective offensively.

The -7% impact on even-strength defense is actually a positive mark. That means that the Caps’ xGA/60 decreases by 7% when Fehervary is on the ice. He’s effective in shutting down the high danger areas right in front of the net, and that’s likely occurring against opponents’ top offensive talents with Fehervary’s difficult deployment rate.


The most important thing for Fehervary this off-season is seeing what his next contract looks like. We saw fellow restricted free agent Alex Alexeyev get a two year bridge contract on Monday, and it’s fair to expect something in the similar term range for Fehervary to keep his cap hit down. On the other hand, if you expect Fehervary to be a fixture on your blue line for the foreseeable future, would it make more sense to lock him up to a longer term contract?

With how the Capitals are trying to revamp the roster, they need to be really careful about the cap space they have when trying to add top six quality forwards. Obviously, there are some contracts they could move out this off-season to create a bit more space, but it might be better to give Fehervary a bridge contract and re-evaluate his contract from there.

Overall, I’d expect to see Fehervary in the top four defensive group next season, barring a potential addition of another top four defenseman this off-season. If the Caps can add another defenseman on the left side, you can potentially have a player of Fehervary’s caliber playing on the third pairing, which would add a lot of depth to the blue line.

By Justin Trudel


Rasmus Sandin: 2022-23 Washington Capitals Season Review
Alexander Alexeyev: 2022-23 Washington Capitals Season Review
Trevor van Riemsdyk: 2022-23 Washington Capitals Season Review
Nick Jensen: 2022-23 Washington Capitals Season Review

About Justin Trudel

Justin is a lifelong Caps fan, with some of his first memories of the sport watching the team in the USAir Arena and the 1998 Stanley Cup appearance. Now a resident of St. Augustine, FL, Justin watches the Caps from afar. Justin graduated with a Bachelor's of Science in Political Science from Towson University, and a Master's of Science in Applied Information Technology from Towson University. Justin is currently a product manager. Justin enjoys geeking out over advanced analytics, roster construction, and cap management.
This entry was posted in News and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Martin Fehervary: 2022-23 Washington Capitals Season Review

  1. Prevent Defense says:

    Hi Justin! Thanks for providing all those great stats on Martin F., an exceptionally good Caps young player. Great analysis

    Fehervary was the first and really the only Baby Cap to “break into” the Veterans-only world of HCPL. He started out great, and then gradually “declined”

    I’m ready to write off a whole bunch of “Declining performance” Caps who experiences “drop off” during the extremely disastrous period of HCPL’s final 3.5 months behind the Caps bench. Caps fans are passionate and well-informed, and we all got to witness the great Dec 2022 period where the Caps were smokin’ hot, even with the absence of a bunch of injured regulars. The Caps would get even BETTER when Wilson and Backstrom got back on the ice — we all thought.

    Well, the injured regulars returned, and the Caps fortunes went KAPUT with great speed. Let’s give it a name: The Caps “Petered-out.” In fact, that’s a new “Caps verb” along with “Stevenson-ing.” Martin F, along with many teammates, experienced “Petering Out” between January and March 2023.

    The point is that Martin F. gets a pass from me for “poor performance” during the Petering-out period of the 2023 Caps. Let’s see what Martin F. can do with GOOD coaching and an Integrate-Youth-Now management mandate.

    • Thanks for reading! I’m also on the same page in terms of kind of “writing off” the last couple months of the season. I’m not sure the motivation was there with the possibility of making the playoffs slowly sifting down the drain.

      There are definitely strong aspects of Fehervary’s game, and he’s only 23 years old. Most defensemen are late bloomers, so we can expect him to improve even more down the stretch.

  2. GRin430 says:

    Fehervary has every tool needed to become a top NHL defenseman. His skating is well above average, and he’s an effective hitter. Like any 22-23-yr-old D-man, he’s going to have his ups and downs. However, but to my ancient eyeballs, he was good this year, and trending upward. With solid coaching, a consistent partner, and a little help from a better-defending set of forwards, he’ll be a stalwart defenseman for the Caps in the coming years. They aren’t going to find a young defender any better anywhere else (teams don’t let those guys go… and please don’t raise Sandin as a better defender… he’s an inferior defender at this point), so I hope they give him a long-term deal.

    • I don’t think I’d categorize Sandin as inferior to Fehervary. They have vastly different skill sets. Sandin is also 23, so it’s beyond fair to say he will have his ups and downs just like Fehervary (or Alexeyev for that matter).

      • GRin430 says:

        As an overall player, Sandin has areas where he is better than Fehervary, particularly his offensive skillset. I was specifically referring to their capabilities as defenders. Fehervary is a much better defender than Sandin at this point, but so is pretty much every other Caps d-man, including most of those in Hershey. Again, they aren’t better overall players, just better defenders right now.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Fehervary is getting a lot of unjust heat as of late. I don’t really get it. He’s still so young. Why would anyone want to trade developing young players? I do worry about the age on the left side. “The 23 club” if you will.

    • Jon Sorensen says:

      ☝️ This. He’s getting there.

    • Anonymous says:

      I think the reason for the heat is that some see him as the second coming of Bobby Orr while others including me saw a disappointing season. I have hope that with health and a better system he and the others will be more consistent. I am not willing to ignore the last part of the season because not everyone was worse. I believe AA for instance played hard and showed improvement even though the season was a loss.

      • Jon Sorensen says:

        The whole blueline had a disappointing season. Why single out Marty, the youngest, least experienced? AA only played well in one pairing, the others were dismal.

        • Anonymous says:

          I am not singling out Marty but the article is about him. I have been critical of the entire Defense but especially the defensive system. Assuming a new system I will expect better performance from all. If there is not improvement then I will assume it is the player and not the system.other players played hard through the end of the season not just AA.

  4. Prevent Defense says:

    Today’s [2 May 2023] gave a feature article describing the demise of “Home-ice advantage” during this season’s NHL playoffs. There was no by-line, only “NHL Staff.” I think there was some “political correctness” reasons for the article being anonymous. Most of the playoff coaches were interviewed, trying to analyze the phenomenon. I liked Gerard Gallant’s answer best.

    Gerard Gallant was an NHL warrior when the NHL was still the NHL. Said Gallant, a forward who played 11 seasons (1984-95), had 211 goals and 1674 penalty minutes: “I don’t think there is any intimidation anymore; very, very little honestly. You might get a team or two that tries that, but for the most part you just play the game. Back in our day there used to be seven or eight fights in the first period and then things settled down.”

    No more fighting, intimidating, or any passion at all. High-speed collisions are banned. Perfectly legal contact carries stiff penalties — 25-game suspensions if your name is Tom Wilson.

    I did note that NYR Jacob Trouba laid-out NJD Timo Meier last night with a Scott Stevens-like high speed collision. Trouba has “gotten away with it” a bunch of times this season. Unless one plays for a NYC-based team, such contact is strictly verboten in the “Department of Player Safety” Parrosian world. Ovechkin used to dish out such hits regularly. Last one was at least six years ago. Trouba’s hit in 1982 would absolutely have led to a major fight between the teams.

    Pittsburgh and Philadelphia and Washington don’t fight each other anymore. Neither does CHI and DET, or COL and DET, or CHI and STL, or even EDM and CGY. The greatest NHL fight of all time was a brawl-fest between the LA Kings and Philadelphia Flyers during the glory years of Tiger Williams and Dave Schultz (1973 or so). The bench-clearing slugfest lasted over an hour. It was also the best honor game in NHL history!

    I think it all stinks. The old NHL was self-policing and passionate and a hell of a lot more fun than Gory Bottmann’s sanitized, Communized, hokey-wokey, salary-cap “parity” NHL. Several internet-based Caps commentary groups — business competitors of this site — are ultra “Woke” to a T, and sentiments of passion or celebrating hockey combat are condemned even to the point of banning commenters from the site.

    I hope I live long enough to see a brighter day for the NHL, when somehow, someway, Gory Bottmann is no longer the “Commissioner” and a “Hockey Man” takes over. Gory B has banned all passion and honor and self-policing from the game. A lot more empty seats than there used to be.

  5. Jon Sorensen says:

    Greetings folks! Just a quick note, if you haven’t done so already, please consider subscribing to NoVa Caps posts in the “subscribe” box located in the upper right corner. Thank you!

Leave a Reply