Backup On The Blueline – Analysis Of The Capitals’ Organizational Depth On Defense

It was no surprise that Capitals General Manager Brian MacLellan made a trade for defenseman Nick Jensen days before the deadline last week. The championship-winning GM has made a move for a defenseman in each of his previous four years as General Manager. What was surprising this go around was that no more than an hour after the trade was made official, the Capitals inked the 28-year old to a four-year deal worth $10 million, the same deal fellow blueliner Michal Kempny signed back in June of 2018. It was a good trade and signing, but in adding a great talent, it created another problem.

A couple months ago, NoVa Caps looked at the Capitals’ overload of left-handed defensemen, and in order to fit them all in properly it would take a trade during the summer. Now that the Caps have added a right-handed defenseman, it makes it even more pressing that the Capitals will have to make a trade or two to make them all fit next season.

So what does the Jensen signing mean going forward? Looking at the future using CapFriendly one can see how he fits.

Screen Shot 2019-02-26 at 8.14.50 PM

Assuming veteran Brooks Orpik retires or isn’t re-signed this summer and Christian Djoos is re-signed as a Restricted Free Agent, it leaves a full defensive bench with John Carlson, Dmitry Orlov, Kempny, Jensen, Djoos, and Matt Niskanen. Which may seem norml, but it is simply too much depth.

If the Capitals are set on the blueline on the NHL roster, it means young players such as Jonas Siegenthaler or Lucas Johansen will have no chance of making the lineup. It’s reasonable for Johansen to stay in the American Hockey League one more season because of two months missed due to injury this season. But for a player like Siegenthaler, that has already played 25 NHL games and looked very good, there can be an argument made he needs playing time. The AHL has nothing else to show him and sitting with the Caps to be the extra defenseman would be just as hurtful to his development.

Even if an argument could be made for him to play in the AHL, there simply isn’t any room down on the Hershey Bears’ roster either.

Screen Shot 2019-02-26 at 9.48.23 PM

There are a couple caveats to this lineup. First, will the Capitals be able to get Chase Priskie under contract? He’s a senior currently second in points among defensemen in the NCAA and can become an unrestricted free agent this summer if he wishes. The good news is he stated he was going to sign with the Capitals last summer, but decided to stay for his senior year to finish on a good note; but nothing is certain in the business world of sports. Additionally, Colby Williams is a Restricted Free Agent this summer, but with all the young players on the team, Williams’ 156 games would give him the most professional experience outside of Tyler Lewington (who could very well be the extra defenseman for the Capitals) and his 222 games, so it’s likely they will want Williams to stay. Another thing to consider is whether the Capitals would be interested in signing Sebastian Walfridsson (2017 fifth-round pick).

And even after all of that, the Bears will probably want a more experienced veteran to play with the young roster. Not one player listed above would be considered a “veteran” by AHL standards, meaning they have played at least 260 professional games. Currently, the Bears have two veterans on the back-end with Aaron Ness and Ryan Sproul, both of whom are having very good seasons (Ness has 39 points in 54 games and Sproul has 15 points – seven goals – in 32 games with the Bears). It would be very hard to imagine that the Bears (or the Capitals, who oversee all roster decisions regarding the Bears, would be willing to roll with three rookies on their blueline. It seems likely that a veteran would be added onto this already large pile of defensemen. And if one or more is, it would add to 10 defensemen to sort through and find time for.

Now it’s easy to see how the problem is starting to emerge. The Capitals simply have too many defensemen fighting for spots not just in the NHL, but also in the AHL. This will lead one to think that there will have to be some sort of trade movement this summer, but the question is who?

At the NHL level it’s safe to assume Carlson, Orlov, and recently signed Kempny and Jensen are safe. That leaves Niskanen and Djoos. Whenever he’s been in the lineup, Djoos has been fantastic. He’s a young puck-moving defenseman that always seems to be doing the right thing to get the puck up the ice. His only downfall is he’s left-handed. And with Siegenthaler and Johansen poised to break into the NHL this makes him expendable. As for Niskanen, it’s easy to see that he has been struggling over the last two seasons. It shows up on the eye test and the underlying numbers, proven here by Evolving Wild’s WAR Charts.

Screen Shot 2019-02-27 at 12.28.49 PM

And it’s nothing that he’s doing wrong, he has the mentality to do it; it’s more likely age (he is 32-years old) is beginning to catch up with him and it’s physically more difficult for him to keep up with top players, particularly for a player that has eaten heavy minutes the last six seasons going against elite players night in and out. This isn’t saying he’s a bad player, but he’s no longer a player that can take heavy defensive starts against great competition. The good news is that the Caps have someone who can do that, the very player they just traded for (graph provided by Bill Comeau).

Screen Shot 2019-02-27 at 12.31.44 PM

And make no doubt it, the Caps traded for Jensen to play in the Top 4. Jensen hadn’t yet played a single game for the franchise and the Capitals signed him to a long-term. This says a lot. Teams don’t just trade for a defenseman and sign them for four years if they don’t envision them playing a big role for them, as teams can sign a player in free agency for half the money and half the length and the Caps have a handful of defensive prospects that could do it. The fact the Caps instantly locked up Jensen also alludes to the fact that they think he’ll end this season and (hopefully) the posteason looking more like a Top 4 defenseman, meaning he’ll cost way more than $2.5 million, saving them some money, making it a safe bet to assume that Jensen will play in the Top 4 at some point , sooner rather than later.

If Carlson and Jensen end up in the Top 4 on the right side, whether it’s this season or next, it would leave Niskanen on the bottom-pairing. Is it worth keeping a player making $5.75 million a season through the next two seasons after this one? For a team that’s always tight up against the salary cap and in need of draft picks, it checks off a lot of boxes in moving Niskanen: they will save money, get draft picks (if they want that return), and it makes room for young defensemen that need playing time. It certainly looks like arguably, the best route is to move Niskanen this summer.

Whether it’s Djoos or Niskanen, moving either would relieve a little pressure throughout the organization’s defensive depth. Here is what the NHL and AHL defensive roster would look like.

Screen Shot 2019-02-27 at 6.23.16 PM

This looks a lot better. It would still be difficult for someone like Tobias Geisser to be sitting, but with all the new players coming in, he’ll still likely get a lot of playing time, and there is always the chance of injuries. As for Kristofers Bindulis, it’s hard to gauge his worth since he only played four games this season with the Bears before suffering an injury and hasn’t played since. Perhaps a stint in the East Coast Hockey League with the South Carolina Stingrays would be best for him next season, which would free up another spot in the AHL.

This still doesn’t address the possibility of the Bears wanting/needing a veteran presence on the blueline. The AHL, though, can have an unlimited number of players on their roster. For instance, the Bears have 10 defensemen on their roster right now. That doesn’t mean, however, it would be smart to have a bunch of young defensemen if they aren’t going to play. Essentially, all the players shown above should be getting consistent playing time to help their development.

MacLellan also mentioned that he wouldn’t be against moving a defensive prospect for an offensive prospect at the same skill level. If he can find a trade partner that makes sense, someone could very well be moved out for much-needed offensive depth.

Either way, the Capitals are loaded with defensemen throughout the organization. It’s a good problem to have, but if development is of importance to them (which it is), then moves will have to be made this summer to make some room. Some moves are obvious but the question is what the Capitals do about it. Even when/if this gets sorted out this summer, they will have the same issue the following summer, but that will be a bridge they’ll cross when they get there.

By Luke Adomanis

This entry was posted in Defense, Hershey Bears, Lineups, Management, News, NHL, Propsects, Roster Moves, Salary Cap, Washington Capitals and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Backup On The Blueline – Analysis Of The Capitals’ Organizational Depth On Defense

  1. Pingback: Capitals Hold VIP Season Ticket Holder Party at MGM Resort at National Harbor | NoVa Caps

  2. Anonymous says:

    What too deep on the back line! Any yet you could not make a trade at the deadline to pickup a top face off man.

    Like

  3. redLitYogi says:

    excellent piece. Caps would have to eat salary to move Niskanen, and the most likely time to move him would have been during the trade deadline. It’s more likely now that a team needing to meet the salary floor would be most interested. I saw Priskie a bit during the development camp (during the Stanley Cup debacle day at formerly-Kettler) and he looked to be the best player on the ice – great speed and skills. He broke a few ankles with his moves. He looks like a gem and one of the better prospects we have. They could consider making him a forward because it looks like he could do that…

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Walker says:

    Not sure I agree with all of this. He seems a bit nonchalant about Djoos. From my point of view (and I originally thought his), why in the world would you trade Djoos. On the one hand, he says he is their best d-man and in the next he proposes to move him. Instead, move Siegenthaler who, to me, seems pretty average with NO offensive upside. And, of course, Orpik HAS to go at the end of the season. And, yeah, trading or letting Nisky go might be a good idea but it would be with no hard feelings. He did a damn good job while he was here. Since Bowey was traded (sadly for me), then they have to get Hobbs playing NHL level preston.

    Like

    • lukeadomanis says:

      In my opinion, I would NEVER trade Djoos, especially over Niskanen. I just put both in there to not cause a riot and give different options. But if it was me it would be Nisky traded 100% this summer.

      Siegenthaler is a beast. He’ll be the next Kempny, a good top 4 defensive defensemen that can move the puck up the ice. In his 25 games he’s been a monster.

      Like

  5. allmyexsliveintexas says:

    This is a nice D lineup you proposed for next year. However, the Caps need to be aware that having so many younger D players creates a problem for the Seattle expansion draft in 2021 (ala Nate Schmidt). Caps can protect 3 defensemen, and Carlson + Orlov will quite likely be protected (although personally I wouldn’t mind seeing Orlov go). That leaves 1 protection spot left to be selected from Kempny, Jensen, Siegenthaler, Djoos, or Lewington. That’s a brutal choice.

    Like

    • lukeadomanis says:

      Yeah it will be. I’d probably go with protecting Jensen unless Priskie signs and shows his potential, which I think is certainly possible. But an alternative to losing a Dman is leaving Oshie available to take.

      Like

      • allmyexsliveintexas says:

        Well, you’re capped at 3 defenders using the 7F-3D-1G option, and the only other option is 8 skaters total + 1G. In the scenarios for the 2nd option, if you want to keep 4D, then it’s Kuznetsov, Wilson, Backstrom (assuming he’s extended), and Vrana remaining. I left Ovi off because he’s a UFA that summer but if he’s extended before that then you obviously have to protect him and exclude someone else. I’m already assuming Oshie and Eller are exposed to the draft.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s