Penguins-Capitals: Assessment of the Capitals “5-Minute Collapse”

Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images

Well the Washington Capitals did it again: they lost a two goal lead in the third period that ultimately led to a game 1 loss. And it all happened in a five-minute span, just a few minutes into the 3rd period. A lot of people will say the Capitals choked again, but did they really? Yes they gave up three goals in five minutes to lose the game, but was it like their “usual” regular season collapses? I’d argue differently. 

Throughout the regular season, and even in the first series against the Columbus Blue Jackets, once the Capitals took a lead they would “turtle”, meaning they would go into a defensive posture to protect the lead, rather than pressing play and continuing their offensive pressure.

When reviewing the Penguins three goals, did you ever think “the Caps are sitting back too much”? I know I wasn’t. The Caps seemed to be playing with the same pace and intensity they were playing with in the first two periods. And the numbers appear to back that up.

Below you’ll find three images from Corsica that show results from the entire 3rd period. The dots represent goals. The red #2 is Ovechkin’s goal, then the blue #3, #4, and #5 are the Penguins goals.


Screen Shot 2018-04-27 at 3.23.58 PM

Shot Attempts:

Screen Shot 2018-04-27 at 3.24.23 PM

Expected Goals:

Screen Shot 2018-04-27 at 3.24.38 PM

From a shots, shot attempts, and expected goals standpoint, the Capitals kept up with the Penguins all the way from Ovechkin’s goal through all three of the Penguins goals. So if the Capital’s were “turtling”, it certainly didn’t show up in the numbers. In fact, it looked like they put up quite a few shots right before the Penguins first goal.

I think what we witnessed was truly just a stretch of bad luck. Tipped shots go in less than 15% of the time, but the Penguins manufactured two deflected goals in a short period of time to tie the game.

And not only were they tipped but they had eyes, especially Jake Guentzel’s goal, which is one of the best tips this season.

Then sandwiched between those two goal was Sidney Crosby’s very lucky goal that wouldn’t have happened if Ovechkin didn’t accidentally redirect it right to him at the perfect speed.

As a fan we shouldn’t see what happened as a choke job because it wasn’t. The Capitals wanted that game and it showed through the whole 60 minutes. They hit a very rough patch but the effort was there. If they play the same way, capitalize on their chances more and don’t befall anymore bad luck they should come out of game 2 with a win.

By Luke Adomanis

This entry was posted in News and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Penguins-Capitals: Assessment of the Capitals “5-Minute Collapse”

  1. Pingback: Tom Wilson Raising His Game in the Playoffs Again | NoVa Caps

  2. Anonymous says:

    Is Crosby playing with an earpiece in his right ear. If so is it legal for the nhl

  3. Anonymous says:

    What is missing from this analysis are the two obvious penalties during that time by the Pens that the refs ignored. The refs also made sure the only time they did call the Pens on a penalty was during a penalty kill the Caps were involved in making it 4 on 4. Trost needs to man up and even if it means a fine or suspension if the refs continue the bad calls and no calls he needs to go out on the ice and get in the refs face like a major league manager.

  4. Pingback: Evgeni Malkin will be a Game-Time Decision for Game 2 | NoVa Caps

  5. Pingback: Game 2 Preview: Capitals Look to Bounce Back | NoVa Caps

  6. Pingback: Capitals Get Rewarded for Complete Effort in Game 2 Victory | NoVa Caps

  7. Pingback: Capitals Get Rewarded for Effort in Game 2 Victory | NoVa Caps

  8. Pingback: Series Shifts to Pittsburgh As Capitals, Penguins Eye 2-1 Series Lead on Tuesday | NoVa Caps

Leave a Reply